Direct answer: Personal face-to-face provides immediate supervision and costs more per session. Online coaching delivery planning, video analysis and support with greater flexibility. Applications are cheap and convenient, but less individualized. Insecure beginners or pain cases may require presence; autonomous clients take advantage of online.
Personal face to face
Best for: who needs real-time correction, is afraid to perform alone or requires close supervision. Limit: cost and dependence of schedule and location.
Online coaching
Best for: Who wants access to specialist, trains at their own time and manages to film and record. Limit: there is no immediate physical intervention during the sets.
Generic application
Best for: who has experience, simple case and reduced budget. Limit: algorithm does not know full context, does not observe execution and rarely adjusts nuances of routine.
Seven criteria to decide
- Professional registration and specialization.
- Level of supervision required.
- Execution correction.
- Frequency of adjustments.
- Support channel.
- Total cost in the period.
- Format you'll really follow.